[2016-10-04] · TRACK RECORD
Signal's published account of a 2016 federal grand jury subpoena from the Eastern District of Virginia, dated 2016-10-04, states that the subpoena arrived with a broad gag order, that the ACLU represented Signal in successfully removing that gag order, and that Signal published the subpoena, its response, its petition to remove the gag order, the government's response and the unsealing order. Signal states the only information it could produce was the date and time a user registered and the last date of that user's connectivity.
signal.org ↗